The right approach to piracy

The right approach to piracy

Is it illegal to illegally download something?

That’s not a trick question.

Australia is, officially, a nation of modern-day pirates. In 2014, Australia was responsible for the fourth highest amount of illegal downloads of TV shows. In the world. That phenomenal statistic suggests many things, including: do you and I think downloading something illegally is, actually, the wrong thing to do?

Piracy statistics from last year point to an answer. In 2015, illegal downloads of movies and TV shows slowed in Australia by about 25 per cent. That drop was sparked by the increased availability of legal streaming services such as Netflix, Stan and Presto.

Such a turn-around sounds like we’ve seen the light. That the issue was our frustration with not having legal channels to bring us all the screen content we deserve.

But Netflix waging war against those who use “geo-dodging” technology reveals something else. Despite international copyright laws and licenses meaning Netflix can only lawfully provide individual countries with particular swags of content, a lot of Australians continue to use technology that allows them access to Netflix in other countries (such as the USA).

While such “geo-dodging” technology is not technically illegal, using it does breach terms of service with Netflix. Which sounds a whole lot like walking the fine line between the letter of the law and the principle behind the law, don’t you think?

 

Right to do wrong?

But whether or not we go so far as to label “geo-dodging” as piracy, the core issue remains: when it comes to downloading stuff illegally, do we actually recognise we’re doing something illegal?

Australia might have cut down on piracy but it is still, per capita, an international leader in illegal downloads.

When we run through our digital libraries of movies and TV shows, what do we find? Legitimate versions or an archive of torrented copies?

Think about how, during the past decade or so, illegal downloading became swiftly accepted as being okay for all of us to do. From kids to grandparents, Christians to atheists, piracy is an illegal activity often not seen as such.

Strange. We can uphold so many other laws yet, when it comes to entertainment, we’re happy to ignore laws to get what we want. Even Christians who, supposedly, live by such biblical teaching as “submit to every authority because of the Lord [Jesus]… For it is God’s will that you silence the ignorance of foolish people by doing good.” (1 Peter 2:13-15) The same passage implores those who have given their life to Jesus to “conduct yourselves honourably” among society, “abstaining from fleshly desires that war against you” (1 Peter 2:11-12).

The language might sound odd to modern ears but the sentiment remains clear-cut. Christians are to live an upstanding (ie LAW-ABIDING) life, wherever they are, because they’re doing that in loving tribute to Jesus. Such an honourable stance will reveal God’s goodness to anyone ignorant of it. Plus, not embracing wonky desires — like the kind that tell us something is okay, when we know it’s not — will help to release the choke-hold they can have on our moral compass.

 

Truth hurts pirates

Feels weird, borderline hysterical and almost “unAustralian” to even be calling for us to consider our thoughts on illegal downloading. But, as 1 Peter 2 continues to reveal, the truth about doing something illegal — even something as “harmless” as pirating a movie or TV show — still remains the truth.

It’s illegal.

So, you know, we shouldn’t be doing it (as hard as that might be to admit and put into practice).

 

Ben McEachen

 

 

 

 

Share

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

3 thoughts on “The right approach to piracy”

  1. I’m not defending piracy per se, but the article’s application of 1 Peter ignores the many times when Christians have felt compelled to disobey laws because they are immoral, defending the interests of the powerful (who write them) over the powerless.
    Others argue that digital technologies place us on a trajectory where existing laws have become in desperate need of review. Others argue that downloading is (or was especially in previous years) an act of civil disobedience when companies either did not provide content to Australia, or provided it at inflated prices over what US customers were being charged.
    Not saying I accept the argument, but I think Jesus’ example is to follow the spirit of the law (eg his teachings on food) not the letter.

  2. Insights Magazine

    Thanks for the comments, Jason. You’re right. This article didn’t take into account the times when Christians are compelled to disobey immoral laws. That’s because the laws Ben was writing about didn’t strike him as clearly falling into the categories that you outlined. As you also wrote, Ben didn’t really accept the argument either that the laws covering online piracy are clearly laws that Christians should vehemently protest against. Of course, if a Christian felt those laws were examples of the powerful oppressing the powerless, they might then pursue means of civil disobedience. But Ben’s article was trying to hit at the heart issue – where we can say we are being civilly disobedient for all kinds of reasons yet, deep down, we know that we’re not living to the spirit of Jesus’ law for living.

    1. Thanks. Since the article more revelations about the tax dodging practises of companies including apple add an extra dimension of refusing to pay money to companies who are themselves not paying money back to our nation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ADVERTISING

ADD AN EVENT

Are you hosting an event in the Synod that will be of interest to Insights’ readers?

To add an event listing email us your event details. A full list of events can be found on our Events page.

Scroll to Top